Florida State
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
26  Jakub Zivec JR 31:18
37  Breandan O'Neill SR 31:23
127  David Forrester SR 31:58
147  Wesley Rickman SR 32:04
199  Seth Proctor 32:14
314  Paul Lagno SR 32:30
374  Will Bridges 32:38
438  William Bridges SO 32:46
488  Josh Gracia JR 32:53
586  Zak Seddon FR 33:05
1,273  Dominick Cabrera SO 34:10
1,626  Daniel Millay SO 34:39
1,632  Sean Quinn SR 34:39
1,933  Michael Wallace SO 35:09
National Rank #14 of 311
South Region Rank #1 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 100.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Nationals


National Champion 0.1%
Top 5 at Nationals 7.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 35.5%
Top 20 at Nationals 85.9%


Regional Champion 85.6%
Top 5 in Regional 100.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jakub Zivec Breandan O'Neill David Forrester Wesley Rickman Seth Proctor Paul Lagno Will Bridges William Bridges Josh Gracia Zak Seddon Dominick Cabrera
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 09/28 567 31:16 31:38 32:52 32:31 32:01 33:24 32:46 32:30
FSU Invitational 10/05 1100 32:50 32:39 33:49
Queens Royals Challenge 10/12 34:24
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 32:43
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 586 31:17 31:38 32:48 32:05 32:22 33:01 33:59
ACC Championships 10/27 460 31:52 31:09 31:48 31:56 32:12 32:25 32:25 32:55 34:44
South Region Championships 11/09 580 31:49 31:49 32:16 32:03 32:11 32:44 32:26
NCAA Championship 11/17 330 30:58 31:03 31:38 31:43 32:12 33:25 32:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 100% 13.4 381 0.1 0.8 1.5 2.2 3.3 3.9 5.0 5.8 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.3 6.5 5.2 5.6 4.5 4.5 4.1 3.9 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2
Region Championship 100% 1.2 31 85.6 13.7 0.7



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jakub Zivec 100% 32.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.1
Breandan O'Neill 100% 38.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.7 2.3 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.2
David Forrester 100% 110.0 0.0
Wesley Rickman 100% 125.9
Seth Proctor 100% 151.7
Paul Lagno 100% 189.6
Will Bridges 100% 206.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jakub Zivec 1.3 42.5 29.8 15.0 4.5 2.5 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Breandan O'Neill 1.7 26.3 33.5 21.7 5.9 3.7 2.6 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
David Forrester 6.0 0.1 1.7 9.0 17.1 12.7 9.8 8.5 7.3 6.4 5.1 3.8 3.8 3.0 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
Wesley Rickman 7.2 0.1 0.5 4.3 11.9 12.2 10.8 8.9 7.5 7.2 6.2 4.8 4.3 3.5 3.1 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4
Seth Proctor 10.1 0.0 0.4 2.7 5.5 7.6 8.0 9.1 8.2 8.0 7.5 6.4 5.4 4.5 3.8 3.6 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.8
Paul Lagno 15.2 0.0 0.2 0.9 1.6 2.8 4.7 5.1 6.6 7.1 6.3 6.9 6.8 5.8 5.8 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.8 2.0
Will Bridges 17.5 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.7 2.8 3.7 4.9 5.3 6.6 7.5 6.9 5.9 6.0 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.4 3.3 3.2 2.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 85.6% 100.0% 85.6 85.6 1
2 13.7% 100.0% 13.7 13.7 2
3 0.7% 100.0% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 100.0% 85.6 13.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 99.3 0.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Eastern Kentucky 98.9% 1.0 1.0
New Mexico 98.4% 1.0 1.0
Tulsa 97.5% 1.0 1.0
Georgetown 80.3% 1.0 0.8
Virginia Tech 59.0% 1.0 0.6
Texas A&M 52.7% 1.0 0.5
Villanova 34.8% 1.0 0.3
North Carolina St. 20.7% 1.0 0.2
Florida 12.5% 1.0 0.1
Duke 11.7% 2.0 0.2
Illinois 2.5% 1.0 0.0
William and Mary 0.9% 1.0 0.0
Washington St. 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Louisville 0.3% 1.0 0.0
North Carolina 0.2% 2.0 0.0
McNeese State 0.2% 2.0 0.0
Boise State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Lehigh 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Navy 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 5.8
Minimum 3.0
Maximum 10.0